DISAVOWAL
Card 002: breach of the law “same crime, same sentence” — conspiracy to murder — one case, two accused · Ontario · he — 6 years, she — 3.5 years
conspiracy to murder — one case, two accused · Ontario · 2010 · he — convicted, 6 years; she — convicted, 3.5 years.
One conspiracy: hire a hitman and kill his wife. One jury. The same two offences for both. She was the one who looked for the killer; the "hitman" turned out to be a police officer.
The Crown asked for the same sentence for both.
Sentence: 6 years for him, 3.5 years for her.
Details: both decisions, the law, what happened after
He
- Case: R. v. Terpstra
- Citation: 2011 ONCA 500
- Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice, jury, 28.06.2010; appeal — Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Date of decision: 2011-07-05
- Charge: counselling murder and conspiracy to murder
- Outcome: convicted
- Sentence: 6 years
- Facts: The same two offences, the same plan and the same jury as hers. The intended victim was his wife (para. 1).
- Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca500/2011onca500.html
She
- Case: R. v. Terpstra (co-accused Serrena Benninger)
- Citation: 2011 ONCA 500, para. 2
- Court: Ontario Superior Court of Justice, jury, 28.06.2010
- Date of decision: 2010-06-28
- Charge: counselling murder and conspiracy to murder
- Outcome: convicted
- Sentence: 3.5 years
- Facts: His girlfriend. Convicted by the same jury of the same two offences; she was the one who looked for the killer (paras. 1, 2).
- Decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca500/2011onca500.html
Law
After
The Court of Appeal left the difference in place: he was the "prime mover", the victim was his wife, and he "used" his girlfriend (paras. 3–4). — https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/2011/2011onca500/2011onca500.html
Machine version: /api/v1/002.json · added 2026-10-17